Why is semi-automatic better than full automatic in our factory?

Why is semi-automatic better than full automatic in our factory?

As it's widely known, labor costs in China have been experiencing a significant upward trend in recent yearsand this trend seems to be a permanent fixture. In response to the escalating labor costs, the typical Chinese approach has been to 

reduce the number of employees. And how is this achieved? By introducing automation into factory operations.

However, it's worth noting that aiming solely for full automation doesn't necessarily tap into the most impactful opportunities for cost 

savings – optimizing the entire system. I broached this very topic two years ago, and many customers share this perspective with me.

I'm not advocating for a return to full manual operations, certainly not. The optimal solution often lies in embracing semi-automation.

Let's consider a straightforward example. According to Wikipedia, a semi-automatic firearm performs all the necessary steps to prepare 

the weapon for firing again after the initial shot. How does this differ from automatic weapons? Semi-automatic firearms won't 

automatically discharge another round unless the trigger is released and then pressed again. In essence, while semi-automation 

simplifies and accelerates certain tasks, a human action is still required.

Translating this concept to office work, semi-automating a task might involve designing a point-and-click operation on a computer. 

Here, the program takes on the heavy lifting, with human operators dedicating just a fraction of time to the task.

In a manufacturing setting, a small machine and specialized tooling can often fulfill the task efficiently.

Automatic handle stitching and material cutting machine

Advantages of semi-automation:

Boost in Labor Productivity: Tasks that remain non-automated can be incredibly time-consuming. 

The leap from zero automation to semi-automation presents considerable advantages, whereas the jump to full automation may have 

limited benefits.

Human Involvement is Maintained: Human operators continue to "pull the trigger," maintaining an understanding of steps and potentially 

envisioning more effective ways to organize their work. This enriches their work content and permits multitasking.

Flexibility in Processes: As only individual tasks (not the entire process) are automated, it becomes much easier to reorganize thegeneral workflow of a process. Room for Continuous Improvement: With a large machine, you're locked into its capabilities. 

Continuous improvement becomes improbable. 

The key lies in maintaining control over task sequence and execution method – achievable through low-complexity semi-automation.

So, when is full automation preferred over semi-automation?

When Human Intervention is Inadvisable: Consider scenarios where human errors have high stakes. 

For instance, Boeing and Airbus engineers contemplate pilot-free planes to reduce human-induced errors during flights.

When Process Optimization isn't Feasible: Some processes are less critical and are suitable for full automation. 

For instance, a thermostat system can activate heating when the temperature drops, without human input. 

However, this isn't applicable to core business processes. Semi-automation is usually the wiser choice.

Your thoughts on this matter are highly appreciated.